Educational FYI's
Educational FYI's are written on topics that effect various aspects of estate planning and the laws that govern it. They are published and posted to this site when news worthy events happen that we feel you should be made aware of. The purpose of an Estate Planning Update is to bring important information to the financial advisors in the community. Our hope is that this information better equips you to assist your clients.
REGISTER TO VIEW FYIs ARCHIVERobert J. Kulas, P.A. releases important estate planning and related articles when there are changes in the law that we feel have an especially large impact. Please take a moment to register to receive full access to our Educational FYIs. |
2010 May Be a Good Year to Die
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 provides that in 2010 the estate tax is repealed and there is no estate tax. Therefore, from a tax perspective, 2010 may be a very good year to die. But, we don't know for sure, as many experts expect Congress to act to prevent the repeal of the estate tax. This article written by Steve Hartnett, Associate Director of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys spells out the process for getting a new estate tax measure passed in Congress and the impact of the delays.$250 Recovery Payments to go to SS and SSI beneficiaries in May 2009.
The Sunday, September 9, 2007 issue of Parade magazine contains an article by Gail Sheehy on family caregiving. It will recount some of her own experiences as a spousal caregiver to her husband.
Roy R. Trudel, a Technical Director at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") recently opined that a state agency has the option of imposing a transfer penalty on an institutionalized spouse if the community spouse transfers protected resources after the institutionalized spouse's eligibility has been determined. Mr. Trudel's opinion, which is a reversal from statements made by previous CMS (HCFA) officials, came about as the result of an email exchange between elder law attorney Robert Mason of North Carolina and himself.
Effect of the Federal Estate Tax on Family Farms and Small Businesses
Recent discussion of the federal estate tax has focused in part, on how it affects family farms and small businesses -- particularly the possibility that having to pay the tax might jeopardize those operations.Social Security and Medicare Trustees Release Annual Reports
Annual reports released from both the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services.Wealthy People Less Likely to Die in Pain
A University of Michigan study finds that wealthier elders are significantly less likely than poorer ones to suffer pain at the end of their lives.IRA Gifts to Charity Temporarily Unlimited
As part of the tax relief provided by Congress, unlimited donations of IRAs or pension plans to charities will be allowed for a short period of time.Groups Campaigning Against Repeal of Estate Tax
Anti-estate tax repeal groups have begun a campaign targeting moderate Democrats and Republicans in a campaign to retain the estate tax. The campaign is helped by the efforts of many major life insurance companies as well as charitable organizations.Spendthrift Trust Not Reachable for Debts Incurred by Beneficiary Acting as Trustee
Two testamentary trusts were created in the decedents will, one for the benefit of each of her sons. One son became trustee of both trusts, and proceeded to empty his brother's trust by investing in his own business, and thereafter failed to account to the other brother. The court entered a surcharge against the trustee-brother and forfeited the surety bond he had posted. The court then gave a judgment in favor of the surety against the defalcating trustee-brother.Final Regulations on Ordering Rules for Charitable Remainder Trusts Issued
The Internal Revenue Services has issued final regulations on the ordering rules of section 664(b) of the Internal Revenue Code for characterizing distributions from charitable remainder trusts (CRTs).Vote for Estate Tax Repeal Delayed; Senator Kyle Prepares Amendment to H.R. 8
Aides to several key Senators have announced that there will be no vote of estate tax repeal in the Senate until after all the relief for the hurricane victims has been secured and the rebuilding in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama begins. Therefore, we can expect that nothing should happen for at least several weeks.Qualified Roth Contribution Programs Gain Attention
Beginning in 2006, 401-K retirement plans may be amended to permit employees to designate some or all of their contributions as Roth contributions pursuant to a "qualified Roth contribution program." Contributions to a qualified Roth contribution program are made on an after-tax basis, but distributions (including earnings) are tax-free.Greenspan Rejects Estate Tax Repeal
On June 21, 2005, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testified before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, during which time he reiterated his opposition to tax-cut proposals that increase the deficit and made clear that this opposition applies to proposals that repeal or drastically reduce the estate tax without fully offsetting the costs.Illinois Governor OKs Modification of Estate Tax
On August 2, 2005, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich (Dem.) signed legislation (HB 1570, now PA 94-0419) that changes the credit for estate and inheritance taxes paid to other states. The new law eliminates one option of the options previously available as to how the credit is calculated for taxes paid to other states.Alzheimer's Disease Symptoms Reversed in Mice
Mice with memory loss have had their condition reversed, a discovery that should help refine the search for a cure for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.Malpractice Claim May Be Brought By Successor Fiduciary Against Agent of Prior Fiduciary (CA)
During the pendency of a will contest, an attorney was appointed as administrator of a decedent's estate. He hired another law firm to assist with complicated tax issues. At some point, the administrator wrote to the tax lawyers confessing that he had misappropriated substantial funds from the estate; the tax lawyers initially attempted to help him borrow money to repay the estate, but ultimately wrote to him (in February) indicating that they withdrew from further representation and advising him to secure other assistance. In May the administrator died; the tax lawyers turned their file over to another attorney in July. In September the deadline ran out for filing IRS form 843, which would have extended the time for claiming a tax refund by three years. In November, after resolution of the will contest, a new executor was appointed and he brought a malpractice action against the two groups of tax attorneys. Both law firms argued that the plaintiff lacked privity with them, since they had been hired by the original administrator, and the trial court granted judgment for the defendants. The intermediate state appellate court affirmed, and the estate appealed to the state Supreme Court. That court now reverses, finding that the state probate code gives a successor fiduciary all the powers that his or her predecessor would have, impliedly including the power to bring an action such as the one here.Testamentary Effect of Trust Provision Requires Compliance With Will Formalities - Arnold v. Davis
A decedent (the widow of country music recording artist Jim Reeves) had established a trust to hold her considerable assets, though her capacity to sign or approve of a trust was later called into question. When she died while conservatorship proceedings were pending, the court granted an interpleader request and ordered that all her trust assets and all income from sale of her late husband's music and real estate holdings be paid to an administrator while the validity of the trust was resolved.A victim that was vulnerable to exploitation made a videotaped statement to police officers two days before she died and a statement to a social work supervisor shortly before her death.
"Direct Lineal Descendants" in Old Trust Does Not Include Adopted Children - McGehee v. Edwards
Several trusts were established in 1929, 1930 and 1931. Each trust limited benefits to the "direct lineal descendants" of the settlor or the settlor's parents. Although state law was amended in 1978 to presumptively include adopted children in the terms "issue" or "descendant," the new law by its terms did not extend to prior trusts. The trustees of the trusts, concerned about potential liability for their determination of the approximately 142 trust beneficiaries, filed an action to determine "who are, or may be direct lineal descendants ... and specifically whether children born out of wedlock" would be beneficiaries. Counsel for one beneficiary answered, asking the court to also determine whether adopted children would qualify, whereupon the trial court appointed guardians ad litem for "persons adopted by lineal descendants, persons born out of wedlock to lineal descendants, persons born to lineal descendants through assisted conception, and legitimate minor beneficiaries and parties unknown."The guardian of person and estate filed a petition requesting compensation for services as guardian. The ward died before hearing on the petition, and guardian filed a second petition seeking additional compensation. Almost two years after the ward's death, the trial court summarily denied the compensation requests. The Florida Court of Appeals reverses the denials, noting that no one objected to the compensation requests, the guardian was not given notice of the pending denial of compensation, and the trial court did not conduct a hearing into the reasonableness or propriety of the fees. The summary denial "violated the guardian's right to due process of law."
Before a husband began chemotherapy treatment he arranged for freezing and storage of semen in case he became sterile. The treatment was unsuccessful and husband died within two months. In-vitro fertilization, begun ten months after his death, was successful and twins were born eighteen months after his death. The wife thereupon filed for Social Security Survivor's benefits for the children, and was denied by the Social Security Administration, an Administrative Law Judge, and a Federal District Court Judge.
Probate Court's Removal of Fiduciary in Six Cases Upheld - Guardianship of Monus
A professional fiduciary, who is the director of a faith-based social service agency, had served as guardian, conservator or trustee for a number of years in six separate cases. The amounts involved in the estates varied from about $13,000 to about $210,000. In each case inventories were filed late or not at all, accountings were sporadic and incomplete, and requests were made for approval of expenditures after the fact. The probate court determined that the fiduciary had violated his obligation to account fully, and removed him from all six cases.Wrongful Death Action Dismissed Against Pharmacy in Death of Nursing Home Resident - Estate of Sharp
The estate of a deceased nursing home resident sued the pharmaceutical provider which had contracted with the nursing home to provide medications. The claims alleged that the pharmacy had failed to monitor administration of controlled substances, to observe that the drugs were either being misused or stolen, or to train the facility's staff in proper drug administration procedures. Relying on cases limiting the liability of pharmacists in wrongful death actions, the trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice.Prior to establishment of a guardianship, a ward had signed and funded a revocable living trust. Prior to her death, the guardianship court had authorized the trustee to sell her home, and directed that the proceeds be held in the trustee's attorney's trust account. After the ward's death, the trustee sought and gained court approval to pay burial expenses, but when the trustee requested authority to pay the trustee's attorney (which would have exhausted the remaining proceeds), the guardianship court refused and directed instead that the trustee pay fees to the guardian and the guardian's attorney, plus previously unpaid court fees associated with the guardianship. The trustee appealed, and the Florida Court of Appeal reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
After their father became incapacitated, his children from a prior marriage filed an action to prevent his wife from taking charge of or dissipating his assets, which were largely held in a self-settled trust naming some of the children as successor trustees. As settlement of that matter, the parties agreed that the children would take over as trustees, that the wife would continue to make care decisions for the husband, and that the husband's trust would pay $25,000 per month to the wife for his care -- and specifically directing that the wife would not be a trustee. Some time later the children became concerned that the money was not in fact being used for their father's care, and sought an accounting from his wife. She successfully objected, arguing that the settlement agreement specifically precluded a finding of a trust relationship, and that they could have (but did not) required an accounting as part of the settlement.
A daughter and granddaughter of elderly woman filed competing petitions for appointment as the woman's guardian. The daughter requested appointment of a temporary guardian, alleging an emergency. At the hearing, the granddaughter acknowledged that she had loaned or transferred over $450,000 to herself using a power of attorney, but alleged that the transfers and purchase of an annuity were for Medicaid planning purposes. When specifically challenged about a $100,000 annuity (on which she had collected a commission on purchase, and naming her children as beneficiaries), the granddaughter characterized her failure to list it as an asset of her grandmother's estate as a "scrivener's error."
